Results tagged ‘ Tetzaveh ’

Tetzaveh

              Tetzaveh
 
 
In this week’s parsha (chapter 28) the Torah details all the clothing of the Cohen Gadol (High Priest). 
 
The Gemara (Erchin, 16b) relates that all the clothing of the Cohen Gadol atoned for certain sins-among them, the Gemara states that the “tzitz” (a golden plate which was worn on the forehead that extended from ear to ear-Rashi, 28;36) atoned for chutzpah (insolence). 
 
However, Rashi (27;2) states that the purpose of the “mizbe’ach” (the altar) was to atone for insolence. Therefore, what was the need for the Cohen Gadol to wear the “tzitz” in order to atone for insolence if that was the purpose of the mizbe’ach? There’s no need to have 2 things to atone for the same sin!?!
 
Additionally, the Gemara (Sotah, 49b) relates that before Mashiach comes there will be a lot of insolence in the world. What’s the connection between the Mashiach and insolence that the Gemara is able to guarantee that there will be a lot of insolence before Mashiach comes? 
 
Furthermore, the Torah (10;29) relates that Moshe told Pharaoh “True have you spoken. I shall never see your face again.” How could Moshe, the humblest person in the whole world (Bamidbar, 12;3) speak so rudely to Pharaoh? When is it “ok” to be chutzpah?
 
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig explains that Moshe Rabbeinu didn’t simply have his own personal agenda but he was also Hashem’s agent and had to make sure that His wishes were carried out. Now, on a personal level Moshe respected everyone and perceived them as having qualities that he didn’t have. This is the definition of modesty-recognizing that other people have qualities you don’t have and respecting them for those qualities. On the other hand, when Moshe acted as Hashem’s agent he had to act very strongly and stand up for the glory of Hashem. As a result Moshe acted with insolence towards Pharaoh as he needed to put Pharaoh in his place and stand up for Hashem. Moshe had to treat Pharaoh like a dog as Pharaoh was constantly disrespecting the power of Hashem by not allowing the nation of Israel to leave Egypt. Thus, we see that insolence is actually a proper character trait at certain times.
 
Similarly, Rabbi Zweig explains that the Gemara (Sotah, 49b) states that before the coming of Mashiach there will
be a lot of “chutzpah” in the world as insolence is necessary to put people in their place in order to carry out Hashem’s agenda and stand up for His name. It is only wrong to be “chutzpah” when a person does so for their own agenda. However, when one acts in such a manner in order to defend the glory of Hashem it is then permitted. 
 
Further, Rabbi Zweig explains that the purpose of the “tzitz” was to atone for insolence of one’s own personal agenda (we could see this from the fact that the golden plate said on it: “Holy to Hashem”-28;36). The mizbe’ach on the other hand was to atone for chutzpah when standing up for Hashem. Meaning, one is allowed to be chutzpah when standing up for Hashem-but only in measurement. One is not allowed to put somebody down even lower than they have to in order to carry out the will of Hashem. 
 
In closing, Rabbi Zweig explains that a father must always give their son the proper amount of respect. Rashi (Bereishis, 31;46) relates that the tribes were like brothers to Yaakov. Meaning, Yaakov gave his sons respect as though they were his brothers-even though he was 80+ years older than them. We therefore see that even though it is permitted to be “chutzpah” at times one is always obligated to accord others the proper amount of respect. 
 

Tetzaveh

                           Tetzaveh

This week’s parsha discusses all of the garments worn by the cohanim (priests) during their service.

The Gemara (Zevachim, 88b) states that all of the vestments worn by the cohanim atoned for sins; The tunic atoned for murder, the trousers for sexual license, the turban atoned for haughtiness, the belt for impure thoughts, the breastplate for misjudgment, the eiphod (shirt) atoned for idolatry, the robe atoned for lashon hara, and lastly, the headplate atoned for stubbornness.

The question is: How could simply wearing these clothes atone for all these terrible sins?

Additionally, why did the torah feel the need to discuss at great length all the priestly garments?

The Rambam (Hilchos Sanhedrin, 19;2) states that when a Cohen performs the service without his priestly garments it’s considered as though a stranger performed it and the service is therefore invalid. However, why should it be considered as though a stranger performed the service when we know in fact that the Cohen performed it? Perhaps we could answer that the Cohen actually becomes a different person when he’s not wearing his priestly garments. And why is that? Simply speaking, people feel different when they wear nice clothing (many people “feel like a million bucks” when they wear fancy clothing). This great feeling then effects the way the person acts and conducts themselves (no one acts the same when they’re wearing a fancy suit vs. pajamas). It could be that the Rambam holds that the Cohanim could only be on a high enough level with their priestly garments in order to perform the service. Now, the main ability one needs to acquire in order to properly do teshuva is the ability to completely change oneself. When the Cohen would wear his priestly garments he would become a completely different person…It was only then that he was considered the Cohen. Were he to wear any other garments while performing the service he would be considered a stranger. Therefore, the Cohen would properly do teshuva by merely wearing the priestly garments because he would become a completely different person than he was before.

However, the service didn’t merely serve as atonement for the Cohen–it atoned for the people as well! Therefore, why should the people also be forgiven for their sins if they haven’t changed themselves?

Perhaps we could suggest that the people would learn from the ways of the Cohanim when wearing their priestly garments and through that they would come to do teshuva. Meaning, the actual wearing of the garments by the Cohanim wouldn’t provide atonement for the people-the effect it would have on the them, however, would lead to atonement.

We could now understand why the Torah went through such great length discussing all the priestly garments–for one must first change their appearance in order to give themselves a better feeling in order to properly do teshuva. The only way to change the person you are is to change your clothes.

Summary: This week’s parsha discusses all the garments worn by the Cohanim while they performed the service. The Gemara (Zevachim, 88b) relates that each of these garments atoned for a particular sin. However, how could one be atoned for sins by simply wearing particular clothes? The Rambam (Hilchos Sanhedrin, 19;2) says that a Cohen who performs the service without his priestly garments is considered a stranger. It seems clear from this that the Cohen is only considered a Cohen when he’s wearing his priestly garments–otherwise he’s just a regular person. Therefore, the Cohanim are able to be atoned for their sins through simply wearing their priestly garments because they’re in effect changing themselves and becoming different people by wearing them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.