Results tagged ‘ Naso ’

Naso

Naso

In this week’s parsha we deal with the laws concerning a Sotah (woman suspected of adultery).

Rashi (5;12) states that if a man withholds from a Cohen the gifts which befit him then Hashem swears that he will end up needing to come back to the Cohen to bring a Sotah.

However, how could it be that just because a man withholds from a Cohen his gifts that his wife will go against him and seclude herself with another man? Every person has free will! How could Hashem seemingly take away her free will and guarantee us (through swearing) that she’ll become a Sotah?

Additionally, why does one who fails to give the Cohen his gifts receive that specific punishment of having his wife become a Sotah? Having one’s wife become a Sotah seems like a very serious punishment for one who simply fails to give a Cohen his gifts!?!

Rabbi Yochanan Zweig explains that Rashi (5;12) states: “If you withhold the gifts of the Cohen.” The word “withhold” (“meakev”) implies that you’re eventually going to give. The reason then why the person withholds the gifts from the Cohen is because they don’t want to give up control. In fact, the person himself wasn’t even allowed to eat the foods. Why then did he not give them to the Cohen? It must be because he didn’t want to give up control. Similarly, a person who isn’t able to give up control to a Cohen will also be unable to give up control at home to his wife. For this reason, Rashi (5;12) states: “I swear by your life that you will need to come to him to bring him the Sotah.” Meaning, if man seeks control over his wife then she will naturally go against him. By having relations with another man a woman seeks to put her husband down and show that she has control. Therefore, Hashem is able to guarantee us and swear that one who seeks control over a Cohen (by withholding his gifts) will eventually have his wife seek control over him (by secluding herself with another man). Similarly, we could now also understand that a man’s wife becoming a Sotah is simply the natural consequence of his inability to live without control.

Interestingly, Rabbi Zweig explains that according to psychologists, 99% of marriage problems are all about control. When a married woman secludes herself with another man it is evident that she is experiencing problems with her husband at home. Therefore, we could presume that a Sotah secluded herself with another man because her husband wanted control over her. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that Hashem is able to guarantee us that one will have to bring a Sotah to a Cohen if he seeks control over his wife at home.

In closing, Rabbi Zweig asks: How does one deal with the issue of control? In order to answer this question, we must first understand why people want control. Rabbi Zweig explains that control gives one the sense of power. On this point, the Mishna (Pirkei Avos, 4;1) states: “Who is powerful? he who controls his inclinations.” From here we could explain that the only way to be able to refrain from controlling others is to learn how to control ourselves as when one controls themself they gain power (as the Mishna, Pirkei Avos, 4;1 writes-”Who is powerful? He who controls his inclinations”) and they therefore feel no need to control others. Thus, in order to avoid falling prey to the common human need for control we should all learn how to control ourselves in order so that we should have the inner strength to live without being able to control others.

Naso

                         Naso
 
In this week’s parsha we deal with the laws concerning a Sotah (woman suspected of adultery).
 
Rashi (5;12) states that if a man withholds from a Cohen the gifts which befit him then Hashem swears that he will end up needing to come back to him to bring a Sotah.
 
However, how could it be that just because a man withholds from a Cohen his gifts that his wife will go against him and seclude herself with another man? Every person has free will! How could Hashem seemingly away her free will and guarantee us that she’ll become a Sotah by swearing?
 
Additionally, why does one who fails to give the Cohen his gifts receive that specific punishment of having his wife become a Sotah? Having one’s wife become a Sotah seems like a very serious punishment for one who simply fails to give a Cohen his gifts!?!
 
Furthermore, Rashi (Vayikra, 23;22) states: “Whoever gives gleanings, forgetting and the corner of the harvested field to a poor person properly is considered as if he built the Bais Hamikdash and brought his offerings inside it.” However, what’s the reasoning for this? Why is one considered as though they built the Bais Hamikdash and brought offerings inside of it just for giving poor people a small amount of crops?
 
Rashi (5;12) states: “If you withhold the gifts of the Cohen.” Rabbi Yochanan Zweig explains that the word “withhold” implies that you’re eventually going to give it but you just don’t want to give up control. In fact, the person himself wasn’t even allowed to eat the foods. Why then did he not give them to the Cohen? Rabbi Zweig explains that he didn’t want to give up control. Similarly, explains Rabbi Zweig, a person who isn’t able to give up control to a Cohen will also be unable to give up control at home to his wife. For this reason, Rashi (5;12) states: “I swear by your life that you will need to come to him to bring him the Sotah.”  Meaning, if man seeks control over his wife then she will naturally go against him. By having relations with another man a woman seeks to put her husband down and show that she has control. Therefore, Hashem is able to guarantee us and swear that one who seeks control over a Cohen (by withholding his gifts) will eventually have his wife seek control over him (by secluding herself with another man).
 
Interestingly, Rabbi Zweig explains that according to psychologists, 99% of marriage problems are all about control. When a married woman secludes herself with another man it is evident that she is experiencing problems with her husband at home. Therefore, we could presume that a Sotah secluded herself with another man because her husband wanted control over her. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that Hashem is able to guarantee us that one will have to bring a Sotah to a Cohen if he seeks control over his wife at home.
 
Now, Rabbi Zweig explains that one who gives gleanings, “forgetting” and the corner of the harvested field to a poor person properly is considered as if he built the Bais Hamikdash and brought his offerings inside it because these are the only gifts in which aren’t under one’s control. By all other gifts one could choose who they want to give it to. By gleanings, ”forgetting,” and the corners of a harvested field, however, one has no control over which poor people come and take the crops, as any poor person could come to his field and walk around all day. One who fulfills this mitzvah properly shows that he’s able to give up control (by allowing anyone to take from his field) and is thus considered as though he built the Bais Hamikdash.  
 
Further, Rabbi Zweig asks: How does one deal with the issue of control? In order to answer this question, we must first understand why people want control. Rabbi Zweig explains that control gives one the sense of power. On this point, the Mishna (Pirkei Avos, 4;1) states: “Who is powerful? he who controls his inclinations.” From here, Rabbi Zweig explains that the only way to be able to refrain from controlling others is to learn how to control ourselves. When one controls themself they gain power, as the Mishna (Pirkei Avos, 4;1) explains, and they therefore feel no need to control others.
 
Summary: In this week’s parsha we deal with the laws concerning a Sotah (woman suspected of adultery). Rashi (5;12) states that if a man withholds from a Cohen the gifts which befit him then Hashem swears that he will end up needing to come back to him to bring a Sotah. However, how could it be that just because a man withholds from a Cohen his gifts that his wife will go against him and seclude herself with another man? Rabbi Yochanan Zweig explains that the word “withhold” implies that you’re eventually going to give it but you just don’t want to give up control. In our case, the man isn’t even allowed to eat the foods! Rabbi Zweig explains that he still nevertheless withheld them from the Cohen because he didn’t want to give up control. Similarly, explains Rabbi Zweig, a person who isn’t able to give up control to a Cohen will also be unable to give up control at home to his wife who will then naturally go against him by having relations with another man in order to seek control. Therefore, Hashem is able to guarantee us and swear that one who seeks control over a Cohen (by withholding his gifts) will eventually have his wife seek control over him (by secluding herself with another man).
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.