Results tagged ‘ Mishpatim ’

Mishpatim

                    Mishpatim
In this week’s parsha (chapter 21) the torah deals with the laws regarding the freeing of Jewish slaves.
 
The Torah (21;2) begins by saying: “When you will buy a Hebrew servant.” However, a jew isn’t a slave until he is bought by someone! Why does the torah call a Jewish slave a “slave” from even before he sells himself?
 
Additionally, why does the torah here (21;2) refer to him as a slave at all? In parshat Behar (Vayikra, 25;46) the Torah refers to slaves as our brothers and tells us that we shouldn’t treat them as our slaves and give them slave labor (Vayikra, 25;39). Rather, the Torah (Vayikra, 25;40) tells us that we are supposed to treat them like hired laborers or residents. Therefore, why does the Torah over here (21;2) refer to Jewish servants as “slaves” if the Torah later tells us that they are our brothers and we are not permitted to treat them as slaves?
 
Furthermore, the Torah (21;5-6) tells us that if a slave says that he loves his master and doesn’t want to go free then we shall bore through his ear with an awl and the slave will be able to work for his master “forever.” Rashi (21;6) however relates that “forever” isn’t to be taken literally. Rather, the slave must go free when the Yovel year comes. However, if that’s the case then why did the Torah say that the slave could serve his master “forever”? Why didn’t the Torah say the truth-the slave is only permitted to serve his master until the Yovel year?
 
Lastly, the Rambam (Hilchos Avadaim, 2;12) explains that when a master sends out his slave he should tell him “Leave!” However, the law is that even if a master doesn’t tell his slave to leave his slave is still nevertheless a free man. Therefore, what is the need for a master to tell his slave to get out of his house if he is free anyway?
 
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig explains that Rashi (21;2) explains that the Torah is dealing with a Jew who becomes a slave because he doesn’t have the money to pay for what he stole. Now, a thief tries to hide his actions for 2 reasons: because he wishes to avoid the consequences and because he wishes to be looked upon as a good person. However, if he desires to be viewed as a good person then why does he steal from others? Rabbi Zweig explains that a person who steals doesn’t want to work in order to reach their full potential and earn the money they are capable of making.
 
Now, Rabbi Zweig explains that a slave has no way of actualizing their potential because everything they do goes straight to their master. By becoming a slave, however, a person is able to realize the consequences of a person who is unable to reach their full potential. As a result, the consequence for one who steals more than they are able to pay back is that they should be sold as a slave.
 
Further, Rabbi Zweig explains that a slave doesn’t understand the full consequences of their actions so they are sold as a slave in order so that they could learn the consequences of their actions. Therefore, a master is actually able to punish their jewish slave just like a regular non-Jewish slave in order to teach them that they should bear the consequences for their actions.
 
Similarly, Rabbi Zweig explains that as a result of a Jewish slave not taking responsibility for their actions they lose their status as a jew to some extent because Jews are supposed to take responsibility for themselves. As a result of him losing his status as a Jew, a Jewish slave is then permitted to marry a Canaanite slave (to which Jews are normally prohibited to marry).
 
Furthermore, Rabbi Zweig explains that the Torah (21;6) states that a slave who doesn’t wish to go free shall be a slave “forever” (even though Rashi (21;6) explains that the torah only means until the Yovel year) simply because the law of a slave going out during the Yovel year is a rule enforced by the courts. A Jewish slave, however, is supposed to want to go free on his own and be his own person. By saying that he wants to stay with his master forever he tells us that he doesn’t want to take responsibility for his actions. As a result, even though the slave goes free, the Torah nevertheless says that he’ll be a slave forever as he’ll always have the same mindset as a slave-namely, that there’s no need for one to bear responsibility for their own actions and reach their full potential.
 
Rabbi Zweig now explains that in parshat Behar the torah deals with a Jew who sold himself as a slave in order to pay off his debts instead of just paying money. That, Rabbi Zweig explains, is the essence of a person who is willing to take responsibility for their actions. Meaning, instead of just paying back money for what he stole he realizes that he himself has to take responsibility for his actions instead of just paying his way out. Therefore, in parshat Behar the Torah refers to slaves as our brothers and commands us that we should treat them properly as unlike the slaves in parshat Mishpatim, the slaves in parshat Behar realize that jews are supposed to bear responsibility for their wrongdoings.
 
Lastly, Rabbi Zweig explains that the Rambam (Hilchos Avadim, 2;12) states that a master is supposed to tell his slave to leave before sending him out (even though by law the slave becomes free even if he doesn’t) because by telling him to get out what he is really telling his slave is that he ne
eds to take responsibility for his actions and become a real man (which is our whole goal behind making him become a slave)

Mishpatim

                       Mishpatim
 
In this week’s parsha we have the sin of hearing lashon hara (23;1, see Rashi) and according to the Rambam the sin of speaking lashon hara as well.
 
There are a lot of difficult questions regarding lashon hara (literally: evil language, meaning: speaking bad about others)…Here are some of them:
 
Firstly, the Gemara (Erchin, 15b) states that lashon hara is equal to idolatry, adultery and murder all put together. However, what’s the reasoning for this? Why is lashon hara such a terrible sin? In fact, the Chofetz Chaim, Vilna Gaon and many other commentators classify lashon hara as the most severe sin in the whole torah! Why is this? (Note: See Gemara, Erchin 15b-16a, as to how severe lashon hara is).
 
Secondly, the sefer Orchot Tzadikim writes that one who accepts lashon hara (meaning, they believe it, or at least act as though they do) receives far greater punishment than one who actually speaks lashon hara. However, why should the listener be punished far greater than the speaker (who’s actually doing the sin) merely for participating?
 
Lastly, the Gemara (Berachot, 19a) states that one who speaks bad about the dead is considered to have spoken bad about a rock. And why is that? The Gemara explains that the dead either don’t know or they don’t care if others speak negatively about them. However, the Gemara later learns out from a pasuk that one who speaks bad about the dead will get thrown into gehinom (hell). Why should one receive such a severe punishment if the person being spoken about either can’t find out or doesn’t care? (Note: One is actually allowed at times to speak negatively of another if they know that person doesn’t care). 

 

Now, I think we could first learn out from the Gemara (Berachot, 19a) that lashon hara isn’t about the damage you are causing to the person being spoken about (for if that were the case then there should be no punishment since there’s no damage). Rather, lashon hara must be about hurting yourself and the listener. What damage is there exactly? I think we could explain that for the speaker, once he sees that he’s able to alleviate his pain and lift himself up by degrading others then he’ll continue doing it. Similarly, for the listener, once he hears the lashon hara (and accepts it), he will, in all probability, “continue the chain” and repeat it to others. Therefore, the speaker and the listener get severely damaged by causing themselves to get “hooked” on lashon hara.

 

However, granted that when one speaks lashon hara they’re hurting themselves and the listener-but why should they receive such severe punishments?

 

The sefer Orchot Tzadikim explains that lashon hara is so severe because teshuva (repentance) is almost impossible! And why is that? Because when one speaks negatively of others, nearly 100% of the time they can’t remember every person they spoke about (especially since it becomes addicting) and therefore can’t properly ask for forgiveness. Additionally, even if one can remember every single person they spoke bad about–they fail to realize that they hurt so many other people (besides the person they spoke about) indirectly by speaking lashon hara.

 

Similarly, I think we could extend that same idea to the listener. It could be that the listener receives far greater punishment than the speaker because it’s much harder for the listener to remember every single person they accepted lashon hara about–and complete teshuva therefore becomes virtually impossible.

 

Summary: Lashon hara (speaking negatively of others), according to many commentators (Chofetz Chaim, Vilna Gaon, etc.) is the most severe sin in the Torah. Why? Additionally, the sefer Orchot Tzadikim says that one who listens to lashon hara receives far greater punishment than one who actually says lashon hara. Why is that? Lastly, the Gemara (Berachot, 19b) says that one who speaks bad about the dead will get thrown into gehinom (hell), even though the dead either don’t know or care. However, why should they be receive such a harsh punishment? It could be that lashon hara is about causing harm towards oneself and the listener (not the person being spoken about), and one therefore receives severe punishment for speaking/accepting lashon hara about the dead. Additionally, it could be that the speaker receives severe punishment because teshuva (repentance) is nearly impossible regarding lashon hara (for it’s extremely difficult to remember every person one has spoken negatively of). Similarly, it could be that one receives far greater punishment for accepting lashon hara than speaking lashon hara because it’s even harder to remember every person you’ve believed something negative about than when you’ve actually spoken about them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.